California LIDAR 2

Okay, so I can’t get over these data quite yet.  One more post.  Oh, and yes, Happy Holidays!  I’m heading to New York this evening — nothing like a Christmas Eve red eye, but I’m excited to see family.  Back to LIDAR for one second.  I wanted to show what the calculation of the DEM with trees minus the DEM without trees (which equals trees, basically) looks like without symbolizing by land cover type.  I originally got this idea from an article discussing LIDAR analysis of gigantic redwoods along the Northern California coast, a project funded by Save the Redwoods League.  So, just below you can see the height of vegetation simply shown with a color ramp.  The darkest red represent the tallest trees, the light blue shows the water or barren land.  This image says so much, it kind of blows my mind.  In the northwest, you can see where the tallest trees follow the natural ravine, along the banks of a stream.  But that square in the center, and the line of trees in the southeast, that could only be created by one thing:  humans and their crazy “property rights.”

So, the next image shows parcel boundaries, and yes, they line right up with the drastic difference in tree height.  This goes to show that just because an area may be forested with identical tree species, there can still be extreme differences in habitat type caused by forest management.

Is there really a difference between looking at these images and just inspecting some aerial imagery?  There is, check it out below.  Zooming to the property line in the southeast, you see the original calculation, just as above, then an aerial image with parcel lines, followed by just an aerial image.  If you look close enough at the aerial, you can make out a property line, but it is definitely not as glaring as the original calculation.  Cheers!  Happy Holidays!

Advertisements

2 Responses to “California LIDAR 2”

  1. not surprising Says:

    And republicans buffoons like Drug Lushbaugh still feel that humans have no impact on the environment. Smart one he is..

  2. M. D. Vaden ~ Arborist and Redwood Trekker Says:

    Wood use is an interesting subject for thought sometimes. Had homeowners never bought wood products of sorts, almost nobody would ever cut trees. So the buyers are the fuel for the machinery of business.

    Those images are pretty interesting. I spend a lot of time looking at Google Earth too.

    Ever seen the quilt-like patchwork around Redwood National Park near Orick, as it appears on Google Earth?

    MDV ~ Oregon

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: