Simplifying a Simple Map

You only need to do a few things to get away from the “conventional” GIS map and improve it’s legibility and aesthetics. In this example below I wanted to make the top map easier to read and more interesting to look at, so I added some topography, got rid of the callout box, deleted the different colors for different states and the north arrow (both of which are unnecessary), simplified city points, and made the roads less visually fragmenting. The one thing that I like about the original map that I should have kept in my revision is the size of the highway symbols. I believe the symbols that I created are a bit too small. But with simple changes there is an overall effect of toning down secondary information and bringing the primary story to light.

senecacreekcomparesmall.jpg

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Simplifying a Simple Map”

  1. Jason Birch Says:

    Nice map. The original is pretty scary.

    To me, the state boundaries seem a bit too prominent on your version.

    I’ve seen quite a few maps that use blue for highways / roads, especially in Europe. I’d personally be worried about them being initially interpreted as water features if I did this.

  2. tsinn Says:

    Jason, that’s a good point. I agree that the state boundaries are too strong. I was trying to overcompensate for the extreme distinction between states in the original. As for roads, I find that shades of gray and red/maroon work really well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: